In this blog, I’ve frequently quoted from the syndicated daily column Coolidge contracted to write after leaving the presidency. He only did that for one year, and as his very lucrative contract was about to expire, he decided not to continue. Naturally, there was speculation as to his reasons. Henry Stoddard, at the time the former publisher of the New York Evening Mail, demanded of Coolidge why he had thus decided.
“I’ll tell you a story about reasons,” Coolidge responded. “A Massachusetts Governor some years ago appointed a judge. He named a young lawyer. The latter called and expressed his gratitude. ‘There’s just one piece of advice I care to give you as to your course on the bench,’ said the Governor. ‘Give your decisions – they may be right; but don’t give your reasons – they may be wrong.’ And so, I’m not going to give you my reasons. I’ve decided to stop.”
Come to think of it, similar reasoning may have been behind his refusal to elaborate on his 1927 statement that he “did not choose to run” for re-election. His decision made, he did not care to state his reasons.
80 years ago on this day, Calvin Coolidge devoted his daily column to a subject near and dear to his heart ( as it ought to be to ours), namely, government debt.He scarcely could have anticipated the day when the national government would be debating ever more extravagant debt ceilings. I wonder if his thinking really is so old-fashioned and outmoded or whether we might do well to follow his advice regarding the virtues of thrift and economy.
As the income and earning power of the people decline, due to depression, governmental debts and expenses become a real problem. We have been going through an era when nearly all the public debts except those of the national government have been increasing. The expectation was that the general expansion of business would make it easy to pay them. Now the opposite condition prevails. Ba retiring and refunding its debt the national government is saving nearly half a billion dollars annually in interest. The only other course would have been more extravagant spending or reduction of taxes. Either one of these would have aggravated the present serious situation of the Treasury.
When money is borrowed by a government or an individual to pay current expenses it means living on capital. If carried far enough, disaster results. When debts are paid it means capital is restored. If carried far enough, prosperity and plenty follow. Some of our municipalities borrowed too much in the day of plenty and are not able to meet their obligations. The national government economized some, though not enough, in the day of plenty and is now able to get credit to take care of the day of adversity.
In his column for April 25, 1931, the former president turned his attention to the question of historical perspective. Of course, popular esteem of his own person and presidency waxed and waned over the years; we are now roughly at that point in time where his era is as distant to us as 1845 was to the readers of his column. While I would be reluctant to characterize the Hoover years as a period when “the country met its difficulties remarkably well”, certainly Coolidge’s own acumen as a statesman is due for a reassessment.
Contemporary opinion is usually too critical and often misdirected. In the perspective of history many of our present seeming imperfections will disappear and the good qualities of our society and government will be more apparent. Before becoming entirely discouraged and hastily deciding everything has so deteriorated that confidence is no longer warranted, it would be well to read some former opinions. Discouraging conclusions are not new. They have continually been expressed even by the able and the thoughtful from the foundation of our republic. As judicially minded a man as Chancellor Kent wrote in 1845, “I think we have at Washington the meanest man, malignant, party hacks and tools that ever were doomed to curse a republic.” Yet the country not only survived, but the government of that day is now conceded to have included some of our most brilliant statesmen.
Sometimes the whole body of the Congress falls into disfavor because of the actions of a few members. The blame lies with the voters who elect undesirable persons. When elected, other members have to work with them.
This republic has a good government. The future undoubtedly will judge this period as a time when the country met its difficulties remarkably well.
In his daily syndicated column Calvin Coolidge Says, the former president remarked on the human quality of ingenuity, so often found in Americans, particularly those of the Yankee variety. While padding his quota of words somewhat with economic statistics, he nevertheless stressed the eternal truth of creativity and ingenuity being innate human qualities that succeed best where the people are free from interference and direction, even when (government) direction is given with the best intentions:
We cannot make any proper estimate of the present or the future without taking into consideration the natural and unconquerable impulse of human nature to improve, produce and progress. Left to itself it will find a way.
A reliable publication recently stated that last year over six hundred new tools were perfected to make the labor of man more effective and more expeditious. The record of new corporationsorganized in the State of New York for the March quarter was over sixty-five hundred. That was thirty-one more than the corresponding period in the previous year. A survey of industrial conditions about the metropolitan area of New York City discloses that four years ago there were thirty-four thousand manufacturing plants with an average of twenty-nine employees.
These accomplishments are not the result of huge aggregations of capital and great engineering skill – they represent the inherent creative energy and ingenuity of the people. This is apparent in every workshop and on every farm in the land. That is the spirit of life. Nowhere has it been so predominant than in the United States. It is a guarantee for the future.
Poring over the draft of his daily newspaper column on Feb. 23, 1931, Calvin Coolidge settled on a topic always near and dear to his heart – taxation. And his comments again seem strangely timely even today:
One of the most astounding spectacles is the complacency with which people permit themselves to be plundered by extravagant government expenditure under the pretense of taxing the rich to help the poor. The poor are not helped but hurt. Taxes have to be collected by the rich before they are paid. They are collected from all people. A higher tax means real wages are lower. The cost of living is higher. The chance to work is less. Every home is burdened. Its value is decreased. The quality of the food, clothing and shelter of the children is reduced.
The Congress and the legislatures know these results of extravagance. The people may not fully realize them but they suffer from them. Legislators do not want to be extravagant. Minorities drive them to it. The people who pay and suffer give little vocal support to economy. They make no threat of political retaliation against those who are taking their money, increasing their cost of living, removing their chance to work. Those who demand appropriations inspire all the fear. Aggregate state and town debt, national and local taxes are increasing enormously. Unless the people resist vigorously and immediately they will be overwhelmed.
In his daily column of Feb. 18, 1931, a scant 80 years ago today, Calvin Coolidge reiterated his belief that the repayment of debt must take precedence over other other considerations, such as further reducing taxes. It is a message that Republicans might do well to heed today.
We still have a small body of thought that considers the national debt has been reduced too fast. It is claimed that the surplus should have been applied to a reduction of taxes. By the same reasoning it would be proven that taxes should be kept down and money borrowed to meet running expenses. It was a great saving to the taxpayers to reduce the debt when the value of the dollar was low. It takes about twice as much cotton, corn, wheat, copper and other materials now to make the same payments as it did two or three years ago.
If it is argued that liquidation of the debt disturbed financial conditions one answer to that is that for every dollar the national debt was reduced state and local governments increased their debts over a dollar.
Besides these reasons any one who knows the enormous pressure on the Congress by organized minorities knows that if the revenues had not been used to reduce the debt they would have gone into additional expenditures rather than tax reduction. Great interest charges have been eliminated. Sound finance calls for payment of debt and makes the revenues of each year meet the expenditures.
On a contemporary note, Nick Gillespie and Veronique de Rugy detail in their very worthwhile article, The 19 Percent Solution, that the main driver of a veritable spending explosion projected by the CBO over the next decades is interest spending, which will grow from 1.4 percent of GDP (or $204 billion in 2010 dollars) to an astonishing 41.4 percent of GDP (or $27.2 trillion in 2010 dollars) over the next 70 years. Even in the short run, it will balloon to 7 percent of GDP by 2030. As every businessperson knows, deficit spending today triggers an avalanche of interest down the road. Coolidge was right that debt reduction is the best strategy to save taxpayers money in the long run.
In his column of Feb. 13, 1931 -exactly 80 years ago tomorrow- , Calvin Coolidge marveled at the spread of radio technology and the very beginnings of television, but also cautioned that moral development should not fall behind technological development. In this he surely was right, and still is.
A new social force is being developed by radio waves. The address of the Pope was given wider broadcasting than any other ever delivered, reaching almost all over the world. The morning papers carry radio photographs of Marconi in Rome preparing for its transmission. Report comes simultaneously of a successful experiment in television by which people in Leipzig were able to recognize the image of a man in Schenectady. The time may not be far away when it will be possible to have a receiving set in the home that will produce a sound motion picture. Central stations may be able to receive and broadcast to the eye and ear events taking place all over the world.
It is difficult to comprehend what an enormous power this would be. New forces are constantly being created for good or for evil. When primitive people come in contact with civilization usually they use its powers for their own destruction. Unless the moral power of the world increases in proportion to its scientific power there is a real danger that the new inventions will prove instruments of our own destruction. If moral development keeps step, peace and good will have gained new allies.
Calvin Coolidge devoted his column of January 17th, 1931 -80 years ago today- to a subject near and dear to his heart both as an individual and as a public person: thrift, which he is careful to differentiate from parsimony and miserliness. I’ve stated before on this blog my belief that the drive for economy or thrift in the operations of the government was perhaps the one big theme of Coolidge’s presidency.
The third week of January has been designated as a time for considering the advantages of thrift, perhaps in part because it follows the birthday of Benjamin Franklin.
Thrift does not mean parsimony. It is not to be in any way identified with the miser. The thrifty person is one who does the best that is possible to provide for suitable discharge of the future duties of life. In its essence it is self-control. Industry and judgment are required to achieve it. Contentment and economic freedom are the fruits.
Most frequently we identify the thought of thrift with various institutions that have been provided to make it effective. We associate savings banks and insurance companies prominently among its agencies. But the main principle is saving today something that will be useful tomorrow. The whole theory of conservation is included. Money is only an incident.
Just at present we need to apply the principle to saving and increasing the strength of our governmental and social stucture as well as our economic fabric. We must not squander those precious possessions. And, above all, a wise thrift now calls for the expenditure of money to save people.
Concluding his first half year as a daily columnist, Calvin Coolidge dispatched the following words of wisdom on Dec. 31, 1930 – almost exactly 80 years ago. Some of them are dated, but then some retain their value and pertinence today:
The year 1930 has been a sharp reminder that men cannot escape from the command that they shall earn their bread by the sweat of their brow. We cannot for long reap when we have not sown. We cannot hold what we do not pay for. The law of service cannot be evaded or repealed. Nor is it yet in the power of man under any system of government he can adopt or any organization of society he can form to make this a perfect world.
But the ability to make the best of things, to secure progress, to learn from adversity is not to be disparaged or ignored. The creative energy of nature is not diminished but increased by the fallow season. Mankind requires a time for taking stock, for recuperation, for gathering energy for the next advance.
That is the significance of the new year. We take a new inventory to see what we have, we take new bearings to see where we are, we correct our conduct by new resolutions. After all due allowance for error and relapse, such a course guarantees improvement. Perhaps the best resolve is to live so that next year new resolutions will be unnecessary.
In his daily column of Dec. 16, 1930 Calvin Coolidge offered a rare tribute to a South American revolutionary and statesman, Simon Bolivar:
On December 17 Colombia, Venezuela, Peru and Bolivia will commemorate the one hundredth anniversary of the death of Simon Bolivar. Nearly twenty million people in those four countries honor him for changing the course of their history.
In a few years his military skill and leadership drove Spain from a territory two-thirds the area of the United States which she had held from the days of Columbus. He ranks as one of the great and true patriots.
Born in Venezuela, trained in Europe, he returned home and dedicated himself and his great possessions to the freedom of his countrymen. Having seen revolution in France and free government in the United States, he adapted them to his own country with the result that his efforts in the north, and those of San Martin in the south, finallymade all of Spanish South America independent.
To the action of a soldier he added the vision of a statesman. He founded governments. Recognizing the unity of interests of the Western Hemisphere, he called the first Pan-American conference at Panama in 1825. His public service and unselfish character entitle him to be named as one of the great figures of the New World.