Calvin Coolidge – an appreciation

Calvin Coolidge

Reacting to the momentous event of his being sworn in as president following the sudden death of Warren G. Harding, Calvin Coolidge deadpanned “I believe I can swing it.” In the minds of his contemporaries, he did indeed swing it, but in the intervening decades, most historians have frowned on the Republican. Several times over the last half-century, the father-son duo of Arthur M. Schlesinger Sr. and Jr. have asked their fellow professors to rank America’s chief executives. These academics always deem Coolidge “below average”–in other words, they think he’s about as accomplished as the dithering Millard Fillmore. Cool Cal didn’t do much better in a 1982 Chicago Tribune poll of 49 “distinguished historians”; they placed him immediately behind Jimmy Carter. In the 1997 Ridings-McIver survey of historians and former politicians, Coolidge came in at number 33, right below Richard Nixon. It may be said that he was unfairly treated by historians almost from the day he left office.

Yet Coolidge deserves better.

He remains one of America’s most underappreciated presidents, a tax-cutting, budget-slashing politician whose very name became synonymous with the fast-growing 1920s economy: “Coolidge Prosperity,” they called it. Governing as a steadfast anti-Progressive between the two activist eras led by Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson, and by Franklin Delano Roosevelt,respectively, Coolidge stood athwart the onward march of an ever-growing government, yelling “Stop!” “The people cannot look to legislation generally for success,” he said in one of his most famous speeches. “Industry, thrift, character, are not conferred by act of resolve. Government cannot relieve from toil.”

The Coolidge years marked a transitional time for the United States, with technological advances improving the lives of ordinary citizens in dramatic ways. While he was president, automobile registrations tripled and phone ownership grew rapidly. The first suburbs appeared, and skyscrapers began to dot the urban landscape. Motion pictures suddenly played sound; they became known as the “talkies,” and theater attendance skyrocketed. Charles Lindbergh flew across the Atlantic Ocean, exciting imaginations everywhere. Literature and the arts flourished in this decade that, like Coolidge himself,  is often unfairly misrepresented as being merely materialistic.

Coolidge seemed to stand on the cusp of the modern era, displaying in his own personality characteristics a mixture of old and new. He was the last president never to have flown in an airplane. He didn’t own a car until he left office, and even then he didn’t drive it. Yet he was a radio pioneer, making use of the new popular medium that allowed him to overcome his lifelong handicap as an indifferent stump speaker. His reedy voice, in fact, was ideal for the airwaves; he delivered 16 radio addresses in five years.

Although he instinctively recoiled from the glad-handing that most successful politicians thrive on, Coolidge embodied a very genuine kind of populism that the age of electronic media would soon destroy. He was, for example, the last president to write his own speeches or spend a significant amount of time in the traditional activity of greeting anonymous White House visitors and passers-by with a quick handshake. He was also the first president to hold frequent press conferences with newspaper reporters, although he insisted that most of these meetings be off the record.

In marked contrast to his successors in the White House, instead of trying to tinker with the economy or control emerging industries with new rules of conduct, Coolidge had the basic good sense to leave well enough alone. “It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones,” he said early in his career, and he remained true to this to the end. One of his important achievements was helping defeat the popular McNary-Haugen farm support bill which would have encouraged farmers to increase production and demand more government support in an escalating spiral of dependency. Coolidge mocked social engineers and central planners–including his own commerce secretary, Herbert Hoover, who would succeed him in 1929–as “world beaters” and “wonder boys.”

Between 1923 and 1928, Coolidge’s first year and last full year in office, he accomplished a feat that appears ever more Herculean as the debt clock ticks upward early in the 21st century: Federal spending didn’t increase. It remained steady at $3.3 billion, even though military expenditures rose slightly. The Coolidge era was a time of small government, and regulation was thin to the point of invisibility. The number of federal employees crept upward from 537,000 to 561,000 under Coolidge’s watch, but most of this hiring was by the Post Office, which was trying to keep up with a growing population. Among Washington bureaucrats, the federal payroll actually dropped from 70,000 to 65,000.

Coolidge managed to cut taxes several times and in several ways. He was especially eager to reduce the income tax burden on top earners, in the belief that freeing their capital for investment would help ordinary workers, pre-dating Kennedy’s “rising tide” by several decades. Similarly antedating the LafferCurve, he also thought a stronger national economy propelled by reduced taxes would help the government’s bottom line. “I am convinced that the larger incomes of the country would actually yield more revenue to the government if the basis of taxation were scientifically revised downward,” he said in his 1924 State of the Union address. Congress always fought him on the cuts, but Coolidge successfully pushed for a series of reductions. Government receipts stayed even at $3.9 billion during his tenure, bearing out his belief that higher tax rates do not necessarily generate higher revenue.

As much as he disliked high taxes, however, Coolidge was first and foremost a fierce budget hawk who consistently used revenue surpluses to pay down the national debt, which had mushroomed during World War I. “While I am exceedingly interested in having tax reduction,” he said in 1927, “it can only be brought about as a result of economy, and therefore it seems to me that the Chamber of Commerce and all others that are interested in tax reduction ought to be first of all bending their energies to see that no unwise expenditures are authorized by the government, and that every possible effort is put forth to keep our expenditures down, and pay off our debt, so that we can have tax reduction.”

Retiring the national debt was “the predominant necessity of the country,” he said, “the very largest internal improvement… possible to conceive.” During his presidency, the debt shrank more than 20 percent, from $22.3 billion to $17.6 billion.

This attitude toward debt grew out of Coolidge’s personal frugality, acquired during his boyhood in rural Vermont. Early in his career, Coolidge refused to accept a salary higher than the one his office received on election day. He didn’t own a home until after he was president. For most of his political career he rented a seven-room duplex in Northampton, Massachusetts, moving out of it only when his quasi-celebrity status as an ex-president drove him to seek more privacy. Coolidge wasn’t a scrooge; he just believed in living honestly and within his means. When a cosmetics company approached the former president about having his wife, Grace, give an endorsement for a large sum, Coolidge wrote back, Sorry, she doesn’t use your product. The novelist Charles McCarry tells an old family story about Coolidge as ex-president. On a summer day, Coolidge borrowed a match from McCarry’s grandfather in Northampton. That fall, they bumped into each other again on Main Street. Coolidge said, “Hello, Will, here’s the match I owe you,” and handed a brand-new kitchen match to an astonished recipient.

Not a “natural politician” on the face of it, Coolidge nevertheless won 19 of 20 races for public office, starting with an 1898 campaign for the Northampton City Council. He worked his way up the political ladder in Massachusetts with a striking deliberateness, moving first into the state legislature, next heading the state senate, then becoming lieutenant governor, and finally rising to governor. Like many Republicans during these years, Coolidge was something of a Progressive, supporting minimum wage laws, a six-day work week, women’s suffrage, and the direct election of senators. Part of this was sincere –few political figures were immune to the Progressive bug in the first years of the century–but much of it also grew from Coolidge’s impulse to win broad constituencies. Moreover, Coolidge wanted to repair the breach in the GOP that erupted in 1912 when Theodore Roosevelt bolted the party and helped Woodrow Wilson win an election with only a plurality of the vote.

Coolidge had stuck with the doomed incumbent, President William Howard Taft, but held no grudges. He could mix with Progressives and occasionally might even govern like one. At bottom, however, he was the last Republican president to hark back to the party’s pre-Progressive roots in any significant way. All his life Coolidge was a consummate party builder, even reaching across racial lines when it wasn’t a popular thing to do: In an unusual political decision for a president in 1924, he gave the commencement address to the all-black Howard University.

In 1920, an insurgency at the GOB convention tapped Gov. Coolidge to run for vice president alongside Ohio Sen. Warren Harding. Coolidge had risen to national prominence a year earlier for his handling of a police strike in Boston, when he forthrightly supported firing the strikers. “There is no right to strike against the public safety by anybody, anywhere, anytime,” he declared, in words that made him almost a household name. The Harding-Coolidge ticket went on to beat Democrats James Cox and FDR. Wags called the 1920 race a “kangaroo election” because the hind legs (vice presidential candidates Coolidge and Roosevelt) were stronger than the front ones.

Coolidge was a serendipitous choice. Republican Party bosses probably would have dumped him for another candidate in 1924 (a common practice at the time). Instead, he appeared on the national scene at precisely the right moment. The ethics of his immediate predecessor, Warren Harding, are best described as Clintonesque: a reckless personal life compounded by a bevy of home-state friends who conspired to enrich themselves at public expense. Harding was enormously popular when he died, but postmortem revelations about his personal life and the behavior of his political appointees might have done lasting damage to the office of the presidency if it hadn’t been for Coolidge’s confident and careful leadership.

Despite all of this, liberal writers and historians denigrate Coolidge as having done “less work than any other American president in history”–i.e., he didn’t create some big government program as his legacy. Coolidge is also frequently tarred with not having prevented the Depression, which would strike less than a year after he left office. But considering that economic historians even today aren’t entirely sure what caused the Depression and what might have been done to prevent it, why must Coolidge shoulder the blame for not predicting what the so-called experts still can’t figure out more than 80 years later?

Presidential historian Richard Norton Smith points out that presidents who are rated as outstanding tend to be those who supplied great conflict and drama; whether they actually advanced the interests of their country is a secondary concern. The famously quiet Coolidge certainly wasn’t a dramatic figure. He had none of the delusions of grandeur that have afflicted so many other presidents, and may well have been the humblest person ever to occupy the office. He performed his job sensibly and well. A neighbor once remarked that “Calvin never takes a chance and strikes out, and never hits a home run. A base hit is his limit. He’ll make that every time.” But like a shortstop who hits .300, always puts the ball in play, and doesn’t make many errors, he’s a valuable veteran, if often overlooked.

When Coolidge died in 1933, some of his severest critics reflected on his time in office with a fondness they didn’t have for him when he served. The poison-penned H.L. Mencken wrote these generous words: “He begins to seem, in retrospect, an extremely comfortable and even praiseworthy citizen. His failings are forgotten; the country remembers only the grateful fact that he let it alone. Well, there are worse epitaphs for a statesman. If the day ever comes when Jefferson’s warnings are heeded at last, and we reduce government to its simplest terms, it may very well happen that Cal’s bones now resting inconspicuously in the Vermont granite will come to be revered as those of a man who really did the nation some service.”

(somewhat updated, reworked and adapted from a Dec. 1998 Reason magazine article by John J. Miller)

3 thoughts on “Calvin Coolidge – an appreciation

  1. Academia & the MSM have placed a lot of good people in the dust bins of history. They’ve succeeded. It may be Coolidge was the greatest president of the 20th and now 21st century. Most likely b/c those orgs are leftist they dissed him and the fact he let the people alone not achieving, in their minds, great things.
    But Coolidge isn’t alone. Barry Goldwater has been quickly written-off and you don’t hear his name ever even as he was a consequential conservative thinker…and, an honest man.
    I just finished reading “Witness” by Whittaker Chambers regarding the Alger Hiss case and here’s another gentleman again placed in that same dust bin.
    Perhaps when Amity Shlae’s bio of Coolidge comes out more attention will be given to him.

  2. Dave, thanks as always, and I totally agree that both Goldwater and Chambers belong in that category. Don’t know much about Chambers (I suppose I should read “Witness” one of these days) but I know Barry G. was a prinicpled and earnest champion of freedom, so much so that he oftentimes was at odds with the GOP establishment, especially in his later years. There is an unfortunate tendency in the MSM and among liberal academics to belittle their opponents, which we’re seeing now during campaign season. The upside is that this also means they consistently underestimate them.

  3. Coolidge is one of my favorite Presidents. I’m allowing myself to learn more about him that would cause me to dislike him because often times, people are “too good to be true.” With that being said, Cal was fantastic. Could you imagine if we had a laissez-faire President these days?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s